Research Policy, 37 (1), 2008 – interesting articles

[German title: Research Policy, 37 (1), 2008 – interessante Artikel]

First- and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs 59-76
Erkko Autio, Sami Kanninen and Robin Gustafsson

  • Abstract: In this paper, we distinguish between firm-level learning effects that result from ‘first-order’ and ‘second-order’ additionalities in innovation policy interventions. ‘First-order’ additionalities represent direct firm-level R&D subsidies, whereas ‘second-order’ additionalities result from knowledge spill-overs, horizontal knowledge exchanges between firms, and from other meso- or community-level effects. Analyzing data from collaborative R&D programs in Finland, we show that enhancing identification with a community of practice among R&D program participants (proxy for second-order additionality) enhances firm-level learning outcomes beyond those resulting from direct R&D subsidy (proxy for first-order additionality). Learning effects facilitated by second-order additionality are not confined to technological learning alone, encompassing also business and market learning. We also show that aspects of program implementation enhance identification with a community of practice, which then mediate the relationship between program implementation and firm-level learning outcomes.
  • Keywords: Additionality; Collaborative R&D programs; Innovation policy; Learning externality; Knowledge spillover
  • doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.012  

Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output 77-96
Jasjit Singh

  • Abstract: We explore the impact of geographic dispersion of a firm’s R&D activities on the quality of its innovative output. Using data on over half a million patents from 1127 firms, we find that having geographically distributed R&D per se does not improve the quality of a firm’s innovations. In fact, distributed R&D appears to be negatively associated with average value of innovations. This suggests that potential gains from access to diverse ideas and expertise from different locations are, on average, offset by difficulty in achieving integration of knowledge across multiple locations. To investigate whether the innovating teams that do manage cross-fertilization of ideas from different locations achieve more valuable innovations, we analyze innovations for which there is evidence of such knowledge cross-fertilization along any of the followings dimensions: knowledge sourcing from other locations within the firm, having at least one inventor with cross-regional ties, and having at least one inventor that has recently moved from another region. Analysis along all three dimensions consistently reveals a direct positive effect cross-regional knowledge integration has on innovation quality, as well as a positive interaction effect of cross-regional knowledge integration and distributed R&D for innovation quality. More generally, our findings provide new evidence regarding the importance of cross-unit integrative mechanisms for achieving superior performance in multi-unit firms.
  • Keywords: Distributed R&D; Knowledge integration; Multinational firms; Collaboration; Mobility
  • doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.004

Read/purchase the articles online.

Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *